And take…the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. Ephesians 6:17
THE
Volume 15, Number
08
Published
by
Location:
Sunday:
Web sites:
Elders
|
In this issue:
Gospel Meeting April 29 - May 4, 2012 Mark Mayberry (Alvin, Texas) April 29 – May 4, 2012
Monday-Friday at
7:00 PM Theme: Lessons in Courage Sunday Class: A Call to Courage Sunday AM: The Courage of Joshua Sunday PM: The Courage of David Monday: The Courage of Asa and Micah Tuesday: The Courage of Haggai and Zerubabbel Wednesday: The Courage of Ezra and the People Thursday: The Courage of Jesus Christ Friday: The Courage of Disciples
(From I-5 take
Exit # 255 and go East 4.2 miles) Easter Sunday Joe R. Price Easter Sunday, the "Feast of the Resurrection", is "the principal feast of the ecclesiastical year" for the Roman Catholic ("Easter", New Advent Encyclopedia). Protestant denominations and non-denominational churches also celebrate Easter with everything from sunrise services to chocolate tasting and Easter egg hunts. (We are told to remember the "true meaning of Easter" -- not unlike the Christmas season.) Churches of Christ do not celebrate Easter as a "holy day" - not because we fail to believe in the resurrection of Christ - far from it. The New Testament of Christ, while recording the wonderful events of His resurrection that powerfully declared Him to be the Son of God (Rom. 1:4), does not teach or sanction a feast day honoring that event. We reject any such additions to God's word. Because we cannot put our finger on the NT passage that authorizes this religious holiday, we will not go beyond the Scriptures and do what God does not approve (1 Cor. 4:6; 2 Tim. 3:16-17; Col. 3:17; 2 John 9-11). The religious holy day Easter is admittedly absent from the pages of the New Testament. The New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia notes, "In any case it must be admitted that while in the New Testament we have definite mention of the observance of the Sunday, or 'Lord's Day', there is no conclusive evidence in the first century or more of the keeping of the Pasch as a festival" ("Easter Controversy", New Advent Encyclopedia). The same Catholic source says, "Commemorating the slaying of the true Lamb of God and the Resurrection of Christ, the corner-stone upon which faith is built, it is also the oldest feast of the Christian Church, as old as Christianity, the connecting link between the Old and New Testaments. That the Apostolic Fathers do not mention it and that we first hear of it principally through the controversy of the Quartodecimans (the last half of the second century, jrp) are purely accidental" (op. cit.). Imagine that. They accidentally failed to mention the "principal feast" of Christianity in their writings until the middle of the second century! Dear reader, it is no accident this feast is absent from the NT and early writers. There was no mention of this feast because men began to celebrate it, speak of it and write of it long after the days of inspiration. The authority to celebrate Easter in honor of Christ's resurrection rests entirely upon the will and traditions of men - not upon the word and will of Jesus Christ (Matt. 28:18-20; Col. 2:2, 21-23). Easter derives its place of importance from men, not from God. It pleases men, but it does not please God (Gal. 1:6-10). "In vain they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men" (Matt. 15:9). As time passed beyond the second century, the traditions of the Feast of the Resurrection were eventually wedded to pagan traditions that celebrated the renewal of life each spring. Eastre, the Saxon goddess of spring and fertility, was worshiped with a festival each spring. As the pagans watched springtime break and overtake the frozen death of winter they sacrificed to Eastre in honor of the life she brought to the earth. The word "Easter" derives from this pagan source; not the divine word of God. Do we believe Jesus rose from the dead? Absolutely! Does that compel us to celebrate "Easter Sunday"? No. God only accepts worship in spirit and in truth. Easter is the result of human traditions, not divine truth. You can find the complete outline of this sermon plus PowerPoint and MP3 Audio files at BIBLE ANSWERS Why it Matters Scripture Reading: Acts 20:17-24 1. Does it
matter what you believe and live? I. THAT JESUS IS THE CHRIST, THE SON OF GOD. A. Because
the Fulfillment of God's Promise Matters, Acts 2:36-41 (39); Gen. 12:3; Gal.
3:8-9, 14; Acts 13:23-41 (38-39). II. WHEN CHRISTIANS SIN. A. Because
Sin is Known and Punished by God, Acts 5:1-11. III. WHEN FALSE TEACHERS COME WITH THEIR FALSE TEACHINGS. A. Because
Error must be Identified, Resisted and not Given Fellowship, Acts 15:1-5;
Gal. 2:1-5; 2 Jno. 9-11. IV. CHRISTIANS ARE PERSECUTED. A. Because
We Must Obey God Rather than Men, Acts 5:27-32, 40-42; 26:9-11. You can find the complete outline of this sermon plus PowerPoint and MP3 Audio files at BIBLE ANSWERS The Choices of Cain Scripture Reading: Genesis 4:1-8 1. Cain
means "acquire" (Gen. 4:1). I. CAIN CHOSE TO OFFER GOD VAIN WORSHIP, Gen. 4:3-5. A. He
did not Sacrifice in Faith, Heb. 11:4; Col. 2:23; Matt. 15:6-9. II. CAIN CHOSE TO INCREASE HIS SIN, Gen. 4:5-8. A.
Sin is not Forced upon us, we Choose it, Gen. 4:7; Rom. 6:4-6, 12-14. III. CAIN CHOSE TO LIE TO GOD, Gen. 4:9. A. Men try to Deceive and Fight against God, Heb. 4:13; Rev. 21:8. IV. CAIN CHOSE TO LEAVE THE PRESENCE OF GOD, Gen. 4:16. A. Cain
Chose Sin instead of Repentance, 4:7-8, 11-14 (Rom. 1:18; 2:5; 2 Ths.
1:8-9). Conclusion -Cain was
faithless (he did not know God):
NOTEWORTHY NEWS
Open for Discussion? The Tennessee General Assembly passed a law this week protecting teachers in that state who allow students to criticize evolution and other scientific theories like global warming. The bill is likely to soon become law ("Tenn. governor 'probably' will sign evolution bill", YahooNews!, Lucas L. Johnson II). "The bill says it would encourage critical thinking by protecting teachers from discipline if they help students critique 'scientific weaknesses'" (Ibid). The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and others oppose the bill, saying it is a way to inject religion into the classroom. "State ACLU executive director Hedy Weinberg said allowing students to critique "scientific weaknesses" is language frequently used by those seeking to introduce non-scientific ideas like creationism and intelligent design into science curriculum. "No one doubts the value of critical thinking to any serious course of scientific study, but this legislation is not truly aimed at developing students' critical thinking skills" she wrote (Ibid). So, if you question the theory of evolution as the explanation for the origin of life you do not think critically; but if you believe life came from lifeless matter you are "scientific". Wow, that's profound! It doesn't take science to tell us "every house is built by someone" (design demands a designer, Heb. 3:4). But we are told that to question how the house (the universe in this case) was built and who built it is somehow unscientific. It is a weak case that refuses to allow its hypotheses to be challenged by evidence and reason. The conclusion that divine creation explains the origin of life does not contradict science (knowledge); it contradicts what is falsely called knowledge or science (1 Tim. 6:20-21). The evidence for divine creation is greater than for inorganic evolution (Rom. 1:20; Psa. 19:1). No wonder Darwinians and their defenders do not want the scrutiny of critical thinking. Why? They refuse to have God in their knowledge (Rom. 1:28). Created by Chuck Sibbing. 04/09/2012 The Spirit's Sword is a free,
weekly publication of the Mt. Baker church of Christ, Bellingham, WA |