"And take...the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God" (Eph. 6:17)
In this issue:
Separating Fact from Fiction
(Joe R. Price)
Trademark on Truth?
(Joe
R. Price)
Sermon Outlines:
Noteworthy News:
Gay Methodist Minister Faces Church Trial
Separating Fact from Fiction
Joe R.
Price
We are all familiar with
the two types of literature, fiction and non-fiction. Fiction, while
its origin may be from real events and people, is a fanciful, fabricated and
imaginary tale; it is not true. Non-fiction, on the other hand, is
written to inform about factual, true-life events (such as biographies,
autobiographies and history).
A task before everyone
who wants to “buy the truth and sell it not” is that of separating
spiritual fact from fiction (Prov. 23:23; 1 Ths. 5:21-22). There are
many false teachers whose teachings offer people “truth” but which are in
fact, fictitious and Biblical counterfeits (1 Jno. 4:1; 1 Tim. 6:20-21).
The “fables” of men turn souls away from “sound doctrine” and
salvation in Christ (2 Tim. 4:3-4; Rom. 1:16). We must be able to tell
the difference. We can do so by…
1.
Testing the teaching to see if it is
even in the Bible. “These were more fair-minded than those
in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness, and
searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so”
(Acts 17:11). If it is not found in God’s word it must be refused:
it is fictitious, a fabrication of the imagination and/or traditions of men
(Col. 2:20-23). Some desire “to be teachers of the law” but
they do not understand what they are talking about (1 Tim. 1:7). Make
sure what someone is teaching you is in the Bible, even when they
confidently affirm it is there.
2.
Testing the teaching to see if it
harmonizes with the rest of the Bible. Truth does not
contradict truth (Psa. 119:160). When a teaching disagrees with the
Bible it is a fable (invention) of men that turns souls away from the truth
(Titus 1:14).
3.
Testing what the teaching produces.
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but
inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their
fruits.” (Matt. 7:15-16) We cannot test the teacher’s heart, but
we can test the teacher’s teaching.
a. Does it agree with the teachings of Christ’s apostles?
The apostle John assures us that when men’s teachings agree with apostolic
teaching it is true: “We are of God. He who knows God hears
us; he who is not of God does not hear us. By this we know the spirit of
truth and the spirit of error.” (1 Jno. 4:6; see 2 Tim. 1:13)
b. Does it promote righteousness or sin (Eph. 5:6-10)?
Error is sinful, and doctrines that lead to sin are not from God; they are
the fiction of men.
When the religious
fiction of men is accepted as truth, the soul is lost (Gal. 1:6-9; 2 Jno.
9). Let us separate fact from fiction, and hold fast “the pattern
of sound words” (2 Tim. 1:13; 4:2-5).
Top
Trademark on Truth?
Joe R.
Price
Evidently that is what some have tried to do.
Of course, they have done this to their own fictitious version of the truth,
not the true gospel (see article on page one).
In 1971 Max King
wrote The Spirit of Prophecy in which he championed a doctrine which
came to be known as “A.D. 70”, “Realized Eschatology” and now, “Covenant
Eschatology.” (We have reviewed this doctrine in a series of articles on the
Bible Answers web site at
http://www.bibleanswer.com/ad70_1.htm. The doctrine says the
second coming of Christ occurred in A.D. 70, we now live in the “eternal
days” and that Jesus will not personally return in the future.) King
has founded Presence Ministries International, and his son, Tim, serves as
President.
It was recently
brought to my attention that King has placed a trademark on his teachings.
More specifically, he has registered a trademark for a particular word which
is intended to convey the heart of his doctrine; “Transmillennial®.”
The trademark is explained on their web site:
“Presence Ministries
secured a registered trademark on the term “Transmillennial®,” particularly
in reference to its use in conferences and study materials. Our intent is
for this worldview to be studied and written about widely, but not to be
redefined or misused by sectarian upstarts, seeking to forward their own
interests.
“In order to keep
Transmillennialism™ a trans-denominational concept, we immediately
established a “Council on Transmillennialism™.” This is a group of
like-minded leaders and ministries to help steward this sacred trust, thus
ensuring that Transmillennialism™ remains open to all faiths and believers.”
(http://www.presence.tv/cms/transmillennial_view.shtml)
For your information, “a
trademark is a declaration from a government that a brand name, logo or
design is new or distinctive enough to be granted the exclusive ability to
market or represent a company and or their goods or services. A
trademark restricts others from using a similar mark in the granted
territories.” (www.commerce-database.com)
And we are supposed
to believe that Transmillennial® doctrine is the truth of God concerning the
interpretation and fulfillment of prophecy? Imagine the apostles of
Christ petitioning the Roman Empire for exclusive rights to the term
“Justification®” so that Judaizers would not corrupt and misuse the term
(Gal. 3:11; 5:4)! Or, perhaps we should trademark “Repentance®” so
false teachers cannot abuse and misuse the truth (Acts 17:30; 26:20).
Absurd! The truth is, King has invented a new doctrine with new words
(unknown to God’s word, 1 Pet. 4:11), and has trademarked his product.
The gospel of Christ
has already been certified as genuine, but not by the authority of men’s
governments: “But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which
was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man,
neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ” (Gal.
1:11-12). By means of divine revelation, miraculous confirmation and
inspiration, the gospel of Christ was proclaimed to the world (Mk. 16:17-20;
Heb. 2:3-4).
As for understanding
divine prophecy, we will continue to trust the interpretations given us by
the Holy Spirit, not Max and Tim King and their Presence Ministries
International: “knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of
any private interpretation, for prophecy never came by the will of man, but
holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit (2 Pet.
1:20-21).
God’s word has free
course; men’s validations or restrictions notwithstanding (2 Tim. 1:9).
We seek the endorsement of God, not man, for what we teach (Gal. 1:10).
No trademark required!
Top
You can find the
complete outline of this sermon at
BIBLE ANSWERS
The Blood of Christ (Part 2)
Scripture Reading: Romans 5:6-11
Part 1 (last week)…
I. BLOOD IN GOD’S PLAN
FOR HUMAN REDEMPTION.
A. Blood Represents Life – Gen. 9:4; Deut. 12:23; Lev. 17:10-12.
B. “Without the shedding of blood” (giving of life) there is No
Remission (Heb. 9:22)
C. But, Blood of Animals Could not Take Away Sins – Heb. 10:1-4.
D. Christ’s Blood (life) Has Been Offered to Accomplish Atonement –
Heb. 10:10-12.
Part 2
(today)…
II. WHAT CHRIST’S BLOOD ACHIEVES.
A. Dedicated His New Covenant – Matt. 26:28; Heb. 9:15-17 (Acts 2).
B. Takes Away Sins – Jno. 1:29. (Remission, Heb. 9:22; 10:
17-18)
C. Reconciliation Through (His) Death – Col. 1:19-22 (Rom. 5:10-11;
Eph. 2:16).
D. Redemption Through His Blood – Eph. 1:7 (Matt. 20:28).
E. Justification by His Blood – Rom. 5:9; 3:24.
F. Propitiation by His Death – Rom. 3:25; Heb. 9:12 (cf. Lev.
16:15-16); 10:19-22.
G. Sanctification With His Own Blood – Heb. 13:12, 14; Rev. 1:5.
III. HOW DO WE OBTAIN THE BLESSINGS OF CHRIST’S BLOOD?
A. Christ’s Blood (His death) Must be Applied to Sins for one to
Receive the Benefit of His Death, Ro. 3:26; 6:3; Acts 22:16
B. Purchased Church, Acts 20:28; Eph. 5:23; Acts 2:36-41, 47.
C. The
Blood of Christ Cleanses Christians when we Confess them to God – 1 Jno.
1:7-9.
Conclusion
Without
blood of Christ one is forever lost in sin.
Top
You can find the complete outline
of this sermon at
BIBLE ANSWERS
Journeys of the Apostle Paul - #1
(From Sinner to Saint)
Scripture Reading: Acts 22:1-16
I. SAUL OF
TARSUS: HIS CONDUCT IN JUDAISM
– Gal. 1:13.
A. His
Standing Before Men: Hebrew of the Hebrews – Acts 22:3; 26:4-5;
Gal. 1:13-14; Phil. 3:4-6.
1. Advanced beyond his peers (Gal. 1:14).
2. Concerning the law, a Pharisee, Phil. 3:5.
3. Concerning zeal, persecuting the church –Acts 22:4;
26:9-11; 9:1-2.
4. Concerning the righteousness which is in the law,
blameless (3:6); Gal. 1:14.
B. His Standing Before God: Sinner of the Sinners – 1 Tim.
1:13-15.
1. Blasphemer (1:13), Acts 26:9.
2. Persecutor of Christ (1:13; Acts 22:19-20).
3. Insolent (1:13); Acts 9:13. (Proud)
4. Unbelieving, ignorant man (1:13).
II. HIS JOURNEY
TO SALVATION.
A. Jesus
Appears to Saul: From Unbelief to Faith – Acts 9:3-6.
B. Sought the Lord’s Will: “What would you have me to do?” –
Acts 9:6 (22:11-16).
C. His Faith Produced Repentance in his Heart – Acts 9:9, 11.
D. His Faith Compelled Baptism–Acts 22:16.
E. When He Became a Christian his Life Immediately Changed – Acts
9:19-20.
III. SAUL’S
CONVERSION IS AN ENDURING EXAMPLE – 1 Tim. 1:14-15.
A. God’s
Mercy is Available to All through Faith in Christ – 1 Tim. 1:14-15.
B. Paul Became a Pattern of God’s Mercy & Longsuffering – 1
Tim. 1:16.
Conclusion
1. Amazing journey
from blasphemer to apologist, from arrogance to self-abasement, from
persecutor to the persecuted, from sinner to saint!
2. The power of the gospel is magnified in Saul & is available to all
sinners in Christ (Rom. 1:16-17).
Top
NOTEWORTHY NEWS
(Current events in the
light of Scripture)
Gay
Methodist Minister Faces Church Trial
Joe R. Price
After more than two years of complaints, investigations and judicial
rulings, the United Methodist Judicial Council announced last Monday that a
complaint could be pursued against Rev. Karen Dammann of Ellensburg,
Washington, for her openly gay lifestyle. The Methodist Book of
Discipline bars “self-avowed, practicing homosexuals” from being ordained or
serving as pastors. The council ruled it “is an egregious error” not
to bring charges when church law is being violated. Dammann serves as
pastor of the First United Methodist Church in Ellensburg (“Gay Methodist
minister likely to face church trial,” The Bellingham Herald, Oct.
29, 2003).
Where to begin?
There are so many things here that deserve a response from God’s word:
Denominational churches (addition, Matt. 16:18; Eph. 1:22-23; 4:4); Judicial
Councils (addition, Acts 14:23; 20:28; 1 Pet. 5:2); Book of Discipline
(addition, Gal. 1:8-9; 1 Cor. 4:6); Church law (addition, Col. 3:17); women
preachers (addition, 1 Tim. 2:11-12); homosexuality (sin, 1 Cor. 6:9-10).
Here are some observations concerning homosexuality.
Dammann says she is
in a “partnered, covenanted, homosexual relationship” (Ibid.).
Are we to believe just because two people agree to live together that God
(and men) must approve of their relationship? It is not true of every
marriage (Matt. 19:9; Rom. 7:2-3) and it certainly is not true of
homosexuality. “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It
is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22; see Rom. 1:24-27). This verse
describes homosexuality, and God says it is an “abomination” – regardless of
what the United Methodist Church says.
If Dammann and her
“partner” repented of their sin could they remain in their “covenanted
relationship?” No, for repentance demands the sinner cease his sin
(Lk. 3:8; Acts 26:20). Why is it brethren can see this truth
concerning repentance when it applies to homosexuals, but refuse to apply it
to adulterous remarriages (Matt. 19:9; Rom. 7:2-3)? Adultery is sin,
just as homosexuality is sin. While the United Methodist Church goes
about judging what “church law” requires, the Bible continues to require
repentance of the sin of homosexuality (and adultery) in order to be
acceptable to God. And, repentance demands the cessation of one’s
sinful conduct (Rom. 6:1-2).
Top
Created by Chuck Sibbing.
11/01/2003
The Spirit's Sword is a free,
weekly publication of the Mt. Baker church of Christ, Bellingham, WA
Send all questions, comments and subscriptions to the editor at:
ssword@bibleanswer.com |